REITs: property income by another route
A REIT is a listed company, but the exam wants you to see THROUGH it: the regime exempts the REIT's property rental profits and gains, and instead taxes the investor when those profits come out as a PROPERTY INCOME DISTRIBUTION (PID). That one design choice generates every rule in the topic. Because the tax point moves to the investor, a PID is taxed as PROPERTY income — non-savings rates, aggregated with other income — and none of the dividend furniture applies: no dividend allowance, no dividend rates. Because the vehicle is exempt, HMRC collects early instead: the REIT withholds income tax at the basic rate (20%) when it pays a PID, and the investor receives the cash net, with full credit — a basic-rate taxpayer usually owes nothing more, a higher-rate taxpayer pays the difference, and a non-taxpayer reclaims the deduction. And because the exemption covers only the PROPERTY RENTAL business, a REIT with other profits pays normal Corporation Tax on them and distributes them as ORDINARY dividends: one company, two streams, two treatments. The distractors are the obvious conflations — PID as dividend, PID paid gross, the REIT taxed like any company, or every distribution labelled a PID.
- Withheld by the REIT at the basic rate
- 1,000 * 0.2 = £200
- Cash received by the investor
- 1,000 - 200 = £800
- Total due at the higher rate on property income
- 1,000 * 0.4 = £400
- Further tax to pay after credit for the withholding
- 400 - 200 = £200
Note which rates appear: non-savings rates on the gross PID, never the dividend rates — and the withholding is a payment on account, not a final tax.